Whole different paradigm transistors came out of the woodwork.

Information technology progresses through a series of S curves where each one is a different paradigm.

This is a new paradigm.

You've got this beautiful paradigm.

So this is the great paradigm.

We'll then go to the next paradigm.

The syntax of most programming languages can be specified using a Type 2 grammar, i.e., they are context free grammars.

Every time one paradigm ran out of steam, another paradigm came out of left field to continue the exponential growth.

We really need to change this whole paradigm with kids and food.

There is still some controversy by notable programmers such as Alexander Stepanov, Richard Stallman and others, concerning the efficacy of the OOP paradigm versus the procedural paradigm.

We need to get the new paradigm of precaution and respect.

Depending on the context, depending on the outcome, choose your paradigm.

We went to the fourth paradigm, transistors, and finally integrated circuits.

In fact, when we see the end of the line for a particular paradigm, it creates research pressure to create the next paradigm.

Some languages are designed to support one particular paradigm (Smalltalk supports object oriented programming, Haskell supports functional programming), while other programming languages support multiple paradigms (such as Object Pascal, C , Java, C , Scala, Visual Basic, Common Lisp, Scheme, Perl, Python, Ruby, Oz and F ).

And I would suggest to you that actually what we are dealing with here, in the Chinese context, is a new kind of paradigm, which is different from anything we've had to think about in the past.

Since then, India has become a poster child for globalization.

The line between a language and its core library differs from language to language.

And the irony of it is, that this is one occasion of a paradigm collapse where we didn't have to wait for a new paradigm to come up.

Yet that is exactly what the American paradigm demands.

And that's typically the paradigm under which we've operated.

This is a 50 year old paradigm called the free choice paradigm.

We call this the biomimetic paradigm copying nature in the lab.

So you need a paradigm shift in all of these areas.

And this is the paradigm that we see throughout the universe.

We are in the pre paradigm days, if you want to use Thomas Kuhn.

And then there's the bottom one, which is called the jazz paradigm.

We're still living with the old paradigm of age as an arch.

If they haven't got a paradigm they can't ask the question.

Habermas has expressed optimism about the possibility of the revival of the public sphere.

This allows users to harness the advantages of object technologies, such as encapsulation.

I think these ideas are difficult to understand, because when you're trapped in one paradigm, the next paradigm is always like a science fiction universe it makes no sense.

The current crisis in evolutionary science does not imply complete rejection of this paradigm.

Very, very bad for economies and companies and cities in our present paradigm.

Most mainstream statically typed languages, such as C , C and Java, are manifestly typed.

Yeah, it's very different no, it's not different.

A different way of life, a different being.

When that comes to an end we'll go to the sixth paradigm three dimensional self organizing molecular circuits.

Approaches There is no established unifying theory or paradigm that guides AI research.

Before then, there was no established paradigm for bringing platform games into 3D.

At the time there was no real support in any programming language for generic programming.

In science and epistemology (the theory of knowledge), a paradigm is a distinct set of concepts or thought patterns, including theories, research methods, postulates, and standards for what constitutes legitimate contributions to a field.

Wildly different.

(Spound of music)

I'm different.